I’m been looking for a solid way to express what Facebook has been doing with me. I think I have it. Here goes...

A govt office publishes data showing that 2+2=4. The data is released without any commentary; just raw data. The conclusion is irrefutable.

A few days later an Executive Branch official holds a press conference at which he states - without evidence - that the public should now hold the view that 2+2=5.7. Soon thereafter numerous “math experts” are interviewed by the media. They say everyone should absolutely hold the view that 2+2=5.7. In fact, anyone who rejects that 2+2=5.7 is a “math denier”, they tell the public.

Not long afterward I make a video in which I present the actual data released by the govt showing 2+2=4. I posit to my audience that one of two things must true; either the data is wrong or the narrative being promoted by the establishment wonks is non-factual. Both cannot be true.

I point out there is no evidence the data is inaccurate and the narrative being promoted by the establishment wonks is offered without any supporting evidence. I suggest the public is best served by following the data/evidence rather than blindly accepting the unsupported narrative of wonks.

Facebook moderators come along, thinking to themselves, “Who the fuck does Champion think he is? It doesn’t matter whether 2+2 equals 4 or 5.7. That’s completely beside the point. What’s important is that everyone gets on-board with 2+2=5.7; we all need to be rowing in the same direction on this. In order to prevent anyone from considering 2+2 might not be 5.7 we’ll repeatedly suspend Champion, ban him from advertising, and dramatically slash the reach of his professional page. We can’t refute that 2+2 really is 4, but we make sure no one sees Champion’s facts, data, or evidence indicating it is not 5.7; we can silence him. Fuck him.”

Now this is my type of book to read!

Very interesting story! Imagine it won't be on all the major news networks.

https://www.dailywire.com/news..../child-court-judge-e

https://cleanfoodcrush.com/ras....pberry-lemon-cheesec

In a few months, if it hasn’t already, President Trump’s legacy at the border is going to look much better even to skeptical observers. As the Biden administration unwinds Trump policies, and a new migrant crisis builds, it is becoming increasingly clear that the Trump team arrived at an approach that, after fits and starts, worked. Counter to the image of the administration taking a blunderbuss approach to everything related to immigration, the push at the border was a thoughtful, creative, and well-coordinated effort across government agencies and between sovereign countries. It is worth revisiting because understanding how it came about and the reasons that it made such a difference underlines the mistakes that Biden is making now, no matter how much his officials and allies want to deny it and shift blame.

Many of Trump’s policy successes — tax cuts, deregulation, judges — came from adopting standard, off-the-shelf GOP policy. There is another category, though, of intractable issues or unexpected crises that were addressed by innovative problem-solving by officials unwilling to accept the conventional wisdom about what was possible. The Abraham Accords and Operation Warp Speed, as well as other aspects of the pandemic response, fall into this category. So does the border, even if has been largely unappreciated. Commentators who were willing to welcome Middle East peace and the rapid development of COVID vaccines, even if it meant giving credit to people they despised, were never going to find anything good to say about the Trump administration’s immigration hawks.

Obviously, department and agency heads such as Kevin McAleenan and Chad Wolf at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Mark Morgan at Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Ken Cuccinelli at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and Mike Pompeo at State played a major part in the effort. At the staff level, White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, who cut his teeth working for Senator Jeff Sessions, took a lead role. He mastered the intricacies of the law and the system and pushed relentlessly against bureaucratic and policy inertia. Even though much of the bureaucracy was hostile, especially at HHS and the State Department, there were career officials at immigration agencies who welcomed, finally, a serious attempt to control the border and were constantly consulted, including at regular White House meetings. There was also a cadre of career officials at State who worked tirelessly to secure complicated agreements with Mexico (the Migrant Protection Protocols, or MPP) and Northern Triangle countries

How Trump Got Control of the Border. And how Biden created a crisis by throwing it all away

Dave Champion heard you were having trouble making comments.

works every time for me. are you using the app or the desktop? possibly its a leftover from when we had our bug after the update. if that is the case, restarting the browser or the computer or both might solve it, or clearing the cache, which is what my techs told me.

If desktop, which browser are you using? If use Opera, FF, and Chrome. Every now and then, FF 'hangs' but it works on the other two. Refreshing/restarting FF has solved it for me.

V Clark

In the last 15 months I've put on 14 pounds of muscle. Not only is that a tall order generally, but what makes it impressive in this case is I did it in my early 60s. Making the gains even better is I did it while reducing joint pain!

15 months ago I switched to Carnivore. I did NOT alter my workout routine. The result has been 14 pounds of new muscle with almost zero joint pain - at 61.

If you like to learn the human physiology that undergirds this kind of accomplishment, read "Body Science". Once you read "Body Science" you'll never again be led astray by the false establishment narratives on proper nutrition and/or human physiology.

Get it here: https://drreality.news/store/